The King's Speech was awarded several Oscars (Academy Awards) this year and rightfully so, in my opinion! As a Speech-Language Pathologist who practices pediatric speech therapy (Birth - 21 years) here in Charlotte, NC at Child and Family Development; and who possesses a special interest in
Fluency/ Dysfluency/ Stuttering, I really appreciated so many things about the plot of this movie; hence, I wanted to comment on a few parts from the story, via this platform...

As shown in the movie, Logue (Geoffrey Rush's character, for which he won an award too) was very intentional about
rapport-building, and the establishment of some ground rules. It seemed he observed the need to immediately establish some equal ground with the new,
esteemed client (the King of England), in order to gain the client's respect, so that the clinician-client relationship could be based on trust and mutual respect. For example, Logue asked to be called by his first name (Lionel),
and he requested permission to call his client "Bertie", a familiar nickname usually used by close family/friends.

Logue also
immediately laid some ground rules, such as
not smoking in his office, and provided a logical, professional reason for such a position and stood by it. Logue was not willing to back down just because his client was "The King" and thus, His Highness had to choose to either respect Logue's rules or seek help elsewhere.
Logue also recognized interpersonal connection opportunities and sensed when to
push Bertie and when to
pull back and simply listen. There's one scene which occurs once the rapport has been built and after Bertie has clearly hit a "wall" of exhaustion after completing other physiological training drills (e.g., core-strengthening, voice projection) have been completed. The two men sit down for a few moments when Bertie shares some background history and quite possibly embarrassing events from his childhood, which one can imagine contributed to Bertie's ongoing difficulties with his speech throughout his childhood and into adulthood. Bertie was apparently made fun of at a young age regarding his speech dysfluencies.

Bertie's dysfluencies most often manifested as "blocks" which is one of several ways dysfluency is exhibited, and it occurs when
no sound is produced because no air is released over the vocal folds/chords, often related to the tension throughout the speech mechanism). Other types of dysfluencies include
sound,
part-word and
whole-word repetitions,
phrase repetitions, sound
prolongations,
interjections (e.g., um, uh, ya know, like, throat-clearing), and
revisions to what has been said already. Depending on the
type of dysfluency,
degree (e.g., # of reps), the
frequency (how often),
duration (# seconds), and the
accompaniment of body movements during occurrences-- severity is determined and interventions are explored.

Logue addressed oral-vocal tension by engaging Bertie in various
relaxation techniques to help loosen him up; and
voice projection drills to increase his
diaphragmatic and
abdominal (core) strength in order to develop a different way to control the air when he uses it to speak-- and to speak
with a purpose.
He also sensed that Bertie needed a concrete glimmer of hope and thus, proved to
Bertie that the King
could indeed speak fluently with some minor modifications to his environment. When engaged in a task which required him to listen to music instead of to himself speaking, the King read a passage out loud, which was recorded and sent home with him as he stormed out on the first day. This turned out to be a successful effort to 'trick' (distract) the mind from focusing on Bertie's speech during the task, plausibly to bypass the anxiety-provoking, mental-turned-into-physiological (i.e., psycho-somatic) responses, such as "blocking". Sometimes such methods work, and clearly it did so for the King. Sometimes, they do not.
However, it's important to remember a couple things--
1) every client IS different and presents differently; and
2) Although there has been an abundant amount of research done, especially that from the field of
genetics, there is yet to be determined a direct, 1:1 "cause" of stuttering/dysfluency; and therefore, there is
no one remedy-- a.k.a "cure all" either.
Working with the pediatric population (ages lately between 3-11 years), my #1 objective is truly
listening and encouraging kids to keep talking; then #2 is
accepting dysfluencies as just
part of the whole package--
the whole child; and #3 is
focusing on the
positive aspects of the child's speech and
building up confidence by focusing more on their overall strengths versus worrying about talking "wrong"/differently.
In this way, foundations for another goal are laid-- #4)
We (client and clinician) can explore together as partners and friends, the set of events that happen and the resulting emotions and attitudes which often occur
before/during/after a "stuttering/dysfluent moment". Using terms understood by the child and empowering them with
truths vs. myths about stuttering, we can have an honest conversation about it, barring threat of judgment by me, the "clinician".
It's typically only after the child knows he/she is accepted fully as a person, that their guard is let down, trust is gained, and therapeutic intervention can occur, which builds up two-or-three-fold for every corrective "knock-down" that the clinician carefully, sensitively provides.